| (And let me jump in with a quick note, a woefully brief exposition –yet another subject for its own essay in its own time I'm sure—on a very important topic: God’s will. I cringe whenever anyone, myself included, uses the concept of “God’s will” or “what God wants” in one-sentence capsules, as though it could be something so simple, something so easily extrapolated by the human mind that it can be summed up in a sound byte. In the broadest sense, nothing more needs to be said than what Kazantzakis’ Jesus spoke in the last Chronicle: “Whatever God wants, this is what will happen.” In that sense, God’s will becomes synonymous with the mind-boggling montage of interrelated, inseparable events we call the world, and the best way to express God’s will is to give a sweeping, all- encompassing gesture with both arms and say, “THIS!” I have also come to sense, though, a will within us, something closer to the point where God and man merge, something more focused. I call this God too, because I sense it as the closest representation of God our minds will allow; in a sense then, this will represents God, the same way Jesus is said to represent on earth the Father God in heaven, without being separate from Him. [But don’t begin to think I’m saying this God is a product of the mind; the mind is a by-product of this God.] It is this will to whom we speak in prayer, and to whom we listen in meditation. God in this form is symbolized by the King in P&K, and God's will, the exploration of which being the central dramatic theme of P&K, could be described as “that which draws us closer to accepting our identity in Christ [non-dual reality –God—manifest in the created universe] in place of maintaining our identity in ourselves.” So the function of this will, you could say, is to draw us onto and along what I’ ve been calling the “narrow path” of self-surrender, and to this will there are as many distinct paths as there are people called to follow them. Naturally we confuse the two perspectives of “God’s will” –one being universal and the other being individual— and wonder how one God could have so many “truths.” But I think even from this truncated explanation, you can see that God has but one unspoken, unspeakable Truth –the unfolding reality in which I AM is every subject, verb and object we perceive— and it is we who create multiplicity out of it by trying to utter it with words. |

| You were hoping to find a picture of Kim Smith here? Well, this is not her, but this one did come up on a Yahoo Images search for "catwoman." Frankly I find it more suitable for this particular forum, so this is the best you're going to do here. If you really must know what she looks like, there are ample resources on the internet. Sorry. |
![]() |