printer-friendly

I'm finding it hard to place the Chronicles in the proper context for introductory purposes, mainly because the proper context seems to keep receding like
the horizon, deeper into the past, as I try to chase it down.  Therefore, adequate or not, I feel the thing to do is to force myself to start at the near-ending,
just as the writings themselves were coming into existence, and allow the rest to remain, as they say, pre-history.  Unwritten, like all the best stories....



At the time, Aubray and I had become involved in the community at the Ashland Christian Fellowship, an evangelical church based in the Calvary Chapel
network.  The Calvary churches grew from the so-called "back to Jesus" movement of the late '60s-early '70s, seeking to offer a home for Christians
alienated by the rigid traditionalism and conservative politics of mainstream Christianity in America.  While maintaining a refreshing political neutrality and
a fairly liberal stance on freedom of thought within the sphere of Christian faith, ACF is still an adamantly Bible-believing fellowship.  The Bible --or
should I say, a literal reading of the Bible as God-ordained history and absolute fact-- is the final arbiter of truth in all spiritual matters, and familiarity
with the Bible, from this perspective, is considered of utmost importance to the Christian life.

But there were no Thought Police at ACF, and the fact that Aubray and I were
never Bible-believers seemed to escape most people's scrutiny.  Most
people there just wanted to be our friends, brothers- and sisters-in-Christ.  I loved that about the fellowship.  It was a very fun and fulfilling place to be.  
Our social lives began to center around ACF's Upper Room Coffee House and Bookstore, one of the finest atmospheres for gathering of souls I've ever
found.  I still have very fond memories of the bonds and friendships that were forged through our time spent at the Upper Room.

As May was coming to a close, however, and my applications to local trucking firms were going strangely unanswered (and with Aubray's uncharacteristic
encouragement), it was becoming more clear that I would soon be leaving Ashland.  When a former long-haul trucking employer, U.S. Xpress, showed
immediate interest in bringing me back to the fleet, I knew that some major changes were being orchestrated.  At very least, USX would have me out on the
road for 14 days, send me back to Ashland for two or three, then out for another fourteen.  I was about to become far more of a stranger around the Upper
Room, in other words.

And it was in this atmosphere of eminent and unavoidable change that Aubray and I decided to be baptized together by our pastors at ACF.

Being baptized is a huge deal at a Bible-believing church, even ones like ACF that are inclined to see the ceremony as
symbolic of one's acceptance of Jesus
Christ as savior and subsequent salvation, rather than as the moment that this actually happens (one of the great debates among Christian denominations).  
Not something that is to be entered into lightly anyway.  Since a baptism is often seen as a public declaration of intent to include oneself in the fellowship
that performs the ceremony, one would be apt to question the decision to be baptised just before leaving said fellowship (which, by then, I knew was
inevitable). And what if these brothers and sisters could read our minds?  Would we be true Christians in their eyes?  Were we true Christians in
God's
eyes?  Does God have eyes???

Putting all questions aside, on the last Sunday in May 2004, Aubray and I were simultaneously dunked into the frigid mountain spring waters of Ashland
Creek by Pastors Mark and P.K. of Ashland Christian Fellowship.  It just felt like the right thing to do.  Aubray's mom flew out from Pennsylvania, and
her sister drove up from Sacramento; it was a celebration of life and love and faith, everything a baptism is intended to be.

And let me tell you, brothers and sisters: I felt washed.  Was Jesus Christ accepted as my personal savior at that moment? No --I don't believe in personal
salvation, and I doubt I ever will in the literal sense.  But I was washed.  Was Christ present then in a way that He hadn't been before?  No --He who is
ever-present never goes away!  But I was washed.  Something very real happened that day, something cleansing.  Maybe it was all the mistakes that
would soon culminate in the decision to end our marriage.  Maybe it was deeper --every mistake I'd made that
ever hurt anyone....and surely there have
been many.  All I know is that, like the average person, I  carry a ton of weight when I remember all these things, and when I allowed myself to be dunked
under water as part of a ceremony that signifies the forgiveness of all of our sins, the question of whether that forgiveness is temporal or eternal, mutable
or immutable, whether it was brand new or it was there all along unbeknown to me....all these questions go out the window for that moment.  All you
know is the water flows, and you become it, and you never again want to be what you thought you were before....

But the questions come back in due time.  That's why we have theology --to answer with words what is already wordlessly determined in our hearts.  We
forget that we never leave the water.

I don't even remember what I told her, but I know the answers were bland, and mostly bogus.  There was no way to answer that question in one or two
sentences, and certainly not on the phone.  But I wanted her to know; I
needed her to understand that it wasn't a snap decision or one I had made lightly,
and why it was important to me to experience it with her, in spite of the growing distance between us.  No one had ever
gotten me so thoroughly on the
spiritual level as Aubray, and vice versa.  Theologically, we "grokked" each other (to borrow the
Stranger In a Strange Land term) in a way that no one else
did, nor perhaps ever will.  For all the trouble and anguish we caused each other trying to work out the terms of our personal cross-bearing together, no one
was more deserving of a full answer to that question, in my eyes, than Aubray.  I wanted her to know that I meant it when my actions told the fellowship
that Sunday that "I believe in Christ."
And perhaps, I wanted myself to know too....

And this was the one aspect of the Christian life I knew I could never surrender to with any sincerity --not when the Bible is held out as Truth, to the
exclusion of all other scriptures that must now be viewed as half-True, or False.  I felt too much of the presence of Christ in my reading of the Upanishads,
for instance, or the Bhagavad-Gita, or the Tao Teh Ching, or the Qu'ran, to ever be able to give those scriptures an inferior status to the equally-inspiring
Christian Bible.  To place my Christian faith in the Bible, and the Bible alone, was actually to cut myself off from the very wellspring of the faith itself!  It
brings me back to what seems like a very anti-Christian, political mindset in which my perspective must be argued at the expense of my neighbor's: far
from the imperative to "love thy neighbor as thyself."   Wherefore should I place the understanding that came from the Upanishads that my neighbor
is
myself?  Is that not the greatest validation of the scriptural imperative we accept as Christians?  Yet the Christian Bible is silent on this most sublime
Truth...and 1600 years of Christian imperialism cannot be far from a direct result.

But that one sentence, put down on paper --"I don't believe in the Bible, but I believe in Christ"-- it liberated me, no less surely than the baptism.  I no
longer felt bound by the little-t "truth" the churches were selling.  I was free to love Christ, and seek the Truth of Christ wherever it was to be found.    
Christ came
alive, in ways the churches always hinted at but rarely made me experience. It proved to me, once and for all, that I will never leave the
baptismal water of God's infinite loving embrace, that I had always been in it and always will be, no matter how much I torment myself with the hell of
feeling trapped in a dying body, and that this is the universal Truth that belongs to
EVERYONE.  Did Jesus bring this about by dying on the cross, or did
he simply come to report and demonstrate that which has always been True?  Or is He a literary archetype for the Messiah who appears again and again
and again throughout human history to remind us of who we really are? Once again: these questions go out the window.  And all you know is the water
flows, and you become it, and you never again want to be what you thought you were before....

But I wanted to share the answers I was experiencing, with everyone now, for I know
the questions will never cease to be asked, so long as there is one being in the world that
feels separate from God.  The single sentence became the opening line for the Camerado
Chronicles.  (Camerado, as the Introduction explains in greater detail, is the name I gave
the truck; I had been reading a lot of Walt Whitman's
Leaves of Grass during my final
weeks as an Ashland resident,and I was particularly taken by the final stanzas of his
"Song of the Open Road," from which the name comes.)  

They were written over a period of approximately five months,
mostly while I was literally behind-the-wheel (and yes, with every due thought placed
toward the safety of the motoring public, ie. never in traffic etc), and emailed to a small
group of family and friends, all as an unrevised "monodraft".  This five-month period
pretty much coincides with the duration I spent doing 48-state long-haul driving, for by
November U.S. Xpress had regionalized its operations to the point where I had to make
a choice as to where I was going to work and rest, and I chose to take a position in my
northeastern homeland; I thought the Chronicles would continue, but the different road
motif lent itself to a different character of writing, and I later decided to draw a line
between
The Camerado Chronicles, which are complete, and the Indefinite Articles,
which are ongoing and more disjointed.  

For the most part, the Chronicles are a Christian-based response to Christian issues, and therefore
less universally-oriented than other current aspects of the Fish Out Of Water project, ie. the
Articles and further drafts of P & K.  I would not discourage readers of any faith or non-faith
from tackling them, but just with the knowledge that the agenda was to speak to a primarily
Christian audience in this case.  What universality there is in the Chronicles is hopefully to be
found in its conclusions and the perspective of the author, not in his words per se.   I have left
myself plenty of theological room to draw the lines out to infinity and embrace the non-Christian
aspects of our shared belief in a God Who Is Love, and the whole of FOOW will certainly do this.

For those of you who would prefer to skim through the Chronicles and sift out its gems from the dross of road journal and dashboard confessional that it
sometimes becomes (and I would advise this for almost everyone), I am constructing a Synopsis page that will help guide you through the rather imposing
Table of Contents (we're talking 40-plus chapters here after all, by the time it's all published).  Not that the other stuff is totally uninteresting --some of
the original folks who received the Chronicles by email said they preferred the "local flavor " of the travelogue portions-- but its contribution to the
FOOW project is often minimal.


Above all, enjoy, and may you rest peacefully in the Love of God in the Highest, the Lowest, and Everywhere In Between.  Remember, the fish never
leaves the water....

Namaste,
Hermit Crab
15 September 2005
Collingswood, NJ



Part One --Introduction
Walt Whitman, inspiration for the "Camerado
Chronicles" title, during his
Leaves of Grass
era. Image courtesy of
Walt Whitman
Quarterly Review